The Expanding Influence of BRICS: Toward a Multipolar World Order

The BRICS bloc—comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, now expanded to include Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, and the UAE—has grown significantly since its formalization in 2009. Initially conceived to highlight economic opportunities in emerging markets, BRICS has evolved into a geopolitical counterweight to Western-dominated institutions. Its members now collectively represent 45% of the global population, nearly 30% of the world’s landmass, and command a combined GDP (PPP) of $65 trillion, underscoring its global significance.

The Historical Trajectory of BRICS

The BRICS grouping originated as "BRIC," coined in 2001 by economist Jim O’Neill to capture the economic dynamism of Brazil, Russia, India, and China. In 2010, South Africa joined the coalition, and the bloc formally became BRICS. The primary agenda of its early summits focused on economic recovery post-2008 and reforming global financial institutions like the IMF and World Bank to better represent developing economies.

From this foundation, BRICS expanded its scope, establishing mechanisms such as the New Development Bank (NDB) and the Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA) to reduce reliance on Western financial systems.

Recent Expansion and Ambitions

In 2024, BRICS underwent its most significant expansion. Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, and the UAE officially joined, while Saudi Arabia continues to deliberate its invitation. This growth aims to enhance the bloc's role in shaping a multipolar world order, reducing dependency on the US dollar, and fostering South-South cooperation.

The 2024 BRICS Summit in Kazan also invited 13 additional nations as partners, signaling broader global interest in the bloc. While membership expansion remains cautious, BRICS appears poised to deepen its influence across Africa, Asia, and Latin America.


Strategic and Economic Frameworks

The New Development Bank

The NDB, headquartered in Shanghai, exemplifies BRICS' alternative financial architecture. Since 2014, it has mobilized $100 billion to fund infrastructure and sustainable development projects. With Egypt, the UAE, and other new members joining, the NDB's capital and operational reach are expected to grow, creating a viable alternative to institutions like the World Bank.

De-dollarization Efforts

A cornerstone of BRICS' financial strategy is reducing reliance on the US dollar in global trade. Initiatives include:

  • BRICS Pay, a payment system aiming to bypass SWIFT.
  • Exploration of a common reserve currency, potentially backed by the bloc's currencies—the "R5" (real, ruble, rupee, renminbi, rand)—or a basket of currencies.

While some analysts view de-dollarization as aspirational, others argue that it could eventually undermine US dominance in global trade, particularly in energy markets.


Geopolitical Dynamics and Challenges

Competing with Western Dominance

BRICS' stated goal of fostering a multipolar world order positions it as an ideological counterweight to Western alliances like the G7. Key initiatives, such as the BRICS Cable—a proposed telecommunications network to bypass US-dominated internet infrastructure—illustrate its ambition to carve out independent systems.

However, the bloc faces significant internal challenges:

  1. Divergent Geopolitical Interests: Border disputes between India and China, or differing views on Russia’s role in Ukraine, could limit cohesion.
  2. Economic Asymmetries: China’s outsized economic contribution (41% of BRICS’ GDP) leads to disproportionate influence, raising concerns among smaller members.
  3. Institutional Integration: Expanding membership complicates decision-making, with consensus required on key policies.

Future Trajectories

Expansion into New Spheres

The inclusion of nations like Iran and the UAE reflects BRICS’ strategic pivot toward energy-rich states, enhancing its collective bargaining power in global energy markets. Meanwhile, partnerships with emerging economies across Africa and Latin America indicate a broadening focus on development and technology cooperation.

Global South Leadership

As interest in BRICS grows among Global South nations, its role as a voice for developing economies becomes clearer. However, the bloc must address economic disparities and institutional inertia to deliver on its promises of inclusive growth and equitable global governance.


Conclusion

BRICS’ trajectory signals a reshaping of the global order. While it is far from overtaking Western-led systems, its initiatives—especially in de-dollarization and development financing—represent meaningful steps toward a more multipolar world. Its success will depend on navigating internal contradictions, ensuring equitable representation, and maintaining a unified vision amidst geopolitical complexities.

As the bloc expands and evolves, BRICS stands at the crossroads of ambition and pragmatism, offering an alternative path for nations seeking greater autonomy in the global system.